The ANA is of limited utility in screening for rheumatologic disease.

Author Name(s):
Edward M. Behrens, MD
Reviewer Name:
David D. Sherry, MD
Clinical Question:

What is the utility of ordering an ANA when a patient is suspected of having rheumatologic disease?

Clinical Bottom Line:

• The ANA is of no use in making or excluding the diagnosis of juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (JRA). • A negative ANA is helpful to exclude the diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematousus (SLE). • A positive ANA can support the diagnosis of SLE, however given the low prevalence of SLE, most positive ANAs will not represent disease. • In patients presenting with Raynaud syndrome, a positive ANA is predictive of having an underlying rheumatologic disease.

Summary of Key Evidence:

• A meta-analysis revealed that the specificity of the ANA for JRA was only 39% and the sensitivity was only 57%.1 • In a more recent 2004 study ANA titers did not distingush between those patients with JRA versus non-inflammatory musculoskeletal pain.3 • Meta-analysis did show that a positive ANA did have a sensitivity of 93% for SLE. However given the low prevalence of SLE in the population its positive predictive value was only 11%. Its specificity was only 57%.1 • Many patients with a positive high titer ANA had no signs of autoimmune disease. Furthermore, children with positive ANA but no clinical signs of autoimmunity were not at greater risk for developing rheumatologic disease in the future.2,4 • In a series of 27 patients with Raynaud syndrome, 100% of patients with rheumatologic disease had a positive ANA, none of the patients without rheumatologic disease had a positive ANA.5

Search Strategy:

not specified

Back to top